War between Russia and the U.S.

 

A video transcript on the provocations of the U.S. toward the Yeltsin Russia, and later the Putin Russia

(129) Vladimir Pozner: How the United States Created Vladimir Putin - YouTube (min.13:08-39:52)

“Yeltsin addressed the joint session of congress. ‘The people of Russia are offering their hand to the people of the United States in friendship, to build a better world, a world without war, a world with peace.’ And this is exactly what the vast majority of Russians wanted. And what the vast majority of the people of Russia want is, if not a friendship with the US., at least a partnership. And what kind of response did he get? Did Russia get? ‘For 40 years you held a nuclear bomb over our heads. You lost the cold war, and you’re going to pay for it’?

Early in 1992 a document was produced by Paul Wolfowitz, Undersecretary of Defense responsible for policy. Unofficially the Wolfowitz doctrine, later officially was called the Bush doctrine, was leaked through the New York Times. What it said was that “the United States should never again allow any other country to challenge it. The U.S. must remain the superior country. And we should tell our allies not to develop their own weapons because we’ll to that for them. And we must watch out for Russia because we don’t know which way it’s going to go. The bear might get up on is hind legs again, and growl.”

It was quickly removed from the New York Times and was rewritten by Dick Cheney and Colin Powell. The attitude towards Russia was, ‘You are no longer a superpower. You are a second rate country. Just keep quiet. Please.’ This became the policy of the U.S. ever since….

When Gorbachev contacted James Baker about letting East and West Germany reunite and Russia offered to assist the take down of the Berlin wall, Baker and other people said, ‘Nato won’t move an inch eastward. (We accept your offer of peace and will not consider it aggression.)’. In the Bush administration and the first 4 years of the Clinton administration NATO stayed put. But in 1996 a decision was taken to enlarge NATO in Poland, Czech Republic, and Hungary. Mr. Kennan said, ‘This is a tragic mistake. The Russians will react adversely. There was no reason for this whatsoever.’

Yeltsin’s response, ‘You promised you wouldn’t do this. So how do we trust you if you make a promise?’ From March 1985 to 2007 since Putin has been in power for 7 years, 22 years total since Yeltsin, not in a single policy, foreign or domestic, did USSR or Russia do anything that might in any was anger, irk, or disappoint the U.S. Enlarging NATO, the 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia by NATO which was dependent on U.S., the recognizing of Kosovo even though it had been part of Serbia for centuries. Yeltsin very, very angry, ‘We aren’t Haiti! You can’t treat us like Haiti! We are a great country! We have a great past, and Russia will come back. Russian will come back!’

Putin elected in 2000 and asked for Russia to become a member of NATO. ‘Why can’t we create an organization where we can be part of it, and act together to help protect against some kind of aggression?’ He was basically told, ‘Go take a walk.’ ‘Or, what about some kind of partnership in the European Union?’ They said, ‘No you’re too big. You’re country is too big.’ And all the while Russia is being reminded that its no longer really that important of a country. So the sense of losing this aura of greatness, of being told, ‘We don’t care about you’, the average Russian’s reaction was ‘You’re insulting me. You don’t respect me.’

And so the anger grew gradually against Gorbachev and Yeltsin, so that today 5% of Russians support them. Putin on 9/11 calls President Bush and offers his help, and does help in Afganistan. And ‘If you want to have your military people in central Asia, right on our borders, be my guest. Same in Georgia, absolutely.’ Not just words, but actions. ‘We want to fight terrorism together.’ And Mr. Putin gets nothing in exchange.

Finally in Feb 10, 2007, at Munich to the Group of 20 Putin says, ‘I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernization of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask, Against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurance of our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? No one even remembers them. But I will allow myself to remind this audience what was said. I would like to quote the speech of General Secretary, Mr. Berner of Brussels on May 17, 1990. He said at the time, “The fact that we are not ready to place a NATO army outside of German territory, gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee.” Where are these guarantees?’

The answer he got was, ‘Yes, but that was guarantees given to the Soviet Union, and you’re Russia.’

What kind of a reaction would you expect? Last year (2017?) in a speech Putin said, ‘Our mistake was that we trusted you too much. And your mistake was you tried to take advantage of that.’

Hermann Goering once said in an interview, ‘Naturally the common people don’t want war, neither in Russia nor in England, nor, for that matter, in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy. And it is a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a Democracy, or a Fascist dictatorship, a Parliament, or a Communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for a lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.’ 

And we are being led by our media, by our politicians in that direction in both countries. I remember an ad(vertisement), by an actor (Morgan?) Freeman, in a famous movie. He said, --and he says to you the audience--, “We are at war.” And, of course, it’s very scary (and a conditioning of millions of minds). Putin is portrayed as worse than Hitler. Even Hillary Clinton compared him to Hitler. What’s going on here?”

My question is, knowing their long history of warmongering between nations and even on the scale of world wars, what is the part of the Jesuits in of all this? Mr. Pozner and most journalists/professional masters of world affairs, seem never to arrive at the source of the problem they are researching. But, the Bible is clear that a world-wide, world-dominating, religio-political Church is behind all the intrigue. As it is written, 

“And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries. 

And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the Prince of the covenant [this vile Church-state entity would never make a full frontal attack, but use sneak tactics politically and spiritually]. 

And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people. 

He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.” (Dan. 11:21-24).

“By peace [he] shall destroy many.” (Dan. 8:25).

“And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.” (Rev. 17:5).

Have we been infiltrated at the highest level?

This Adventist minister(?) sounds like a Jesuit. Where did he study theology, Georgetown University? And who hired him to fill the position of Religious Liberty? How long have both offices been held by the same person? It seems that those offices need to be separated like church and state, like the Israelite throne and the priesthood. It is like the Secretary of Defense being the Secretary of State. This looks like a set-up. This is a sign of something terrible to come.

Let's remember Ellen White's statement:

"Let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never

changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still

the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but

the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now

as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing

when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday

exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their

purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her

lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United

States that the church may employ or control the power of the state;

that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short,

that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience,

and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.

God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this

be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes

of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare." Great Controversy, p. 494.

If she were alive today, she would not only speak to the Protestant churches, but to her own General Conference. For sure, she would fire a letter to Dr. Diop.

Ganoune Diop’s Tragic Interview with the Jesuits at Georgetown University

10-14-2020 07:49 PM CET | Leisure, Entertainment, Miscellaneous

Press release from: Advent Messenger

“Will they permit this man to present doctrines that deny the past experience of the people of God? The time has come to take decided action” (Selected Messages, vol. 1, p. 204).

The Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs is an academic research forum located at Georgetown Jesuit University in Washington, DC. Recently, they interviewed Ganoune Diop on a wide range of topics. [1] We regret to report that in Adventism today, we can no longer see any distinction between pastors and politicians. The ideals defended by Ganoune Diop during his recent interview with the Jesuits are more in line with the Pope’s encyclical on a universal brotherhood than with the beliefs held by our Seventh-day Adventist pioneers. Below is part of the interview: 

Jesuits: What was the heart of the work you are doing in several quite distinct roles at the Seventh Day Adventist Church?

Ganoune Diop: Several doors have opened to me and, walking through them, I have realized a core in my calling in this world, which is human solidarity, a deep respect for other people’s choices that leaves aside our differences. That is freedom of conscience: conscience to believe or not to believe. If I genuinely believe in that, then that means I must genuinely embrace others. This, I think, is one of the reasons why, providentially, I’m positioned to be there as the secretary of one the largest Christian organizations, the Conference of Secretaries of Christian World Communions, entrusted with the privilege to meet the top leaders of all denominations, developing friendships, with genuine interest in all. I was also asked to be part of the board for the Global Christian Forum, that, again, brings together different Christian streams: Orthodox, Catholics, Anglicans and many other Christians. I believe that, through my journey, God has placed me to be a person of reconciliation, a person bringing people together, a person genuinely respecting and embracing the humanity of others. [1]

Ganoune Diop says that as a leader in the General Conference, God has called him to be a “person of reconciliation” to unite churches to embrace humanity with one another. Who does he think he is, the Pope? This is the answer he gave to the Jesuits at Georgetown University when asked about his role in the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

Where does Ganoune Diop get his mission statement from? The United Nations? Rome? Because this is the same language that Pope Francis uses in his encyclical (Fratelli Tutti) when he calls for the creation of a universal brotherhood based on one humanity. This has nothing to do with Adventism. God has already told us what our mission statement is and why we exist as a people:

“In a special sense Seventh-day Adventists have been set in the world as watchmen and light-bearers. To them has been entrusted the last warning for a perishing world. On them is shining wonderful light from the Word of God. They have been given a work of the most solemn import,—the proclamation of the first, second, and third angels’ messages. There is no other work of so great importance. They are to allow nothing else to absorb their attention” (Evangelism, p. 120).

Jesuits: I am interested to learn more about the Adventist church. There seem to be quite distinct silos (independence): the church itself, ADRA, and the whole medical side. How do these relate, within the Adventist and the outside worlds?

Ganoune Diop: Among some Adventists, for example, you find people who insist on the signs of the times: that some terrible thing will happen. Some Adventists at the fringe of the mainstream faith may develop a rather sectarian understanding, that “we are the best”. To me, that is totally misconstrued, a misunderstanding. To a large degree, without diminishing the dignity of these people, I might say it’s misinformation about God’s purposes for the world. The gospel is the good news about God’s first coming and good news about the second coming, meaning the coming of the savior to deliver people from the human predicament: suffering, disease and death.
No church is monolithic, and every church is basically a mosaic. We find that also among Adventists. Some tend to create silos (independence) of sorts, but that’s hopefully a minority among Adventists. What I am trying to promote personally is a more universal, more accepting approach. I meet everyone, including Adventists who are less welcoming, again a minority. Some can be even anti-Catholic (as some Catholics can be anti-many things). I position myself as a part of the human family, wanting to make a difference in this world, respecting people’s consciences, because to me, that’s like an inner sanctum where basically people ought to be. People are sacred, like temples, and therefore, ought to be respected. [1]

Ganoune Diop denounces certain Seventh-day Adventists in his interview with the Jesuits. He describes those who talk about the last day prophetic signs of the times as part of the “anti-Catholic,” “fringe” and “sectarian” “minority.” He accuses these Seventh-day Adventists of misconstruing and misunderstanding God’s will for the last days. He claims they are spreading misinformation.

Well, it was Martin Luther who called the Pope Antichrist. If classical Protestantism is dead and if there are no more reasons to protest, why are we separated from Rome? If the reasons for leaving Babylon have been resolved, why are we still divided? We should all return home to the universal ecumenical brotherhood of Rome consisting of all beliefs and gods known to man.

But if biblical prophecy is true, if there really is a sinister power described in Revelation 13, 17 and 18 that is planning global tyranny right now, then the protest is not over. God put prophetic warnings in His word. If they don’t apply to Rome, as Luther and the other Reformers believed, to whom do they apply? These are the words of God and are meant to be interpreted and proclaimed. The warnings will bring joy and salvation to those who receive them (Revelation 15:2) and pain and loss to those who don’t (Revelation 14:9, 10). These end-time prophecies are not critical or hateful words, lest we accuse God of these charges.

Next, Ganoune Diop promotes the pantheistic and unbiblical idea that people are sacred (holy), like temples and should be respected. Does this mean that if people are sacred, they should be left to their pagan superstitions? This is the same mischief promoted by Korah when he challenged Moses with the words: “All the congregation is holy, every one of them” (Numbers 16: 3).

People aren’t sacred; life is sacred. People are by their human nature corrupt and depraved and in need of redemption:

“There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.” Romans 3:10-12.

It is only through the everlasting gospel, as it is received, that Christ replaces corruption and lust with godliness and virtue (2 Peter 1:2-4). This is the motive for preaching the Three Angels’ Message and bringing men and women to repentance. This is not criticism, it’s redemption.

Jesuits: When did you go to France? Was this after the baccalaureate?

Ganoune Diop: I went to France when I was in my 20s … While I was in Annecy (France), something else happened that once again broadened my perspectives. I wanted to devour everything around knowledge. Reading was a passion: going to the library to sit and read for hours. I went to the library at the top of the mountain in Annecy, a Catholic convent that had a library that was a center. I drove there one day and was sitting, reading, when a nun approached me. She asked if I was interested in theology and I replied that I was indeed. As we began talking, I recall well, on a Wednesday, she told me that Jean Delorme, a specialist in the gospels, in particular, the book of Mark, was leading a study group at the library that evening. He was among the avant garde in France, promoting semiotics in literature, but also religious literature, including the bible. The nun who had approached me, knowing nothing at all about me, simply invited me to join the study group that very evening. I accepted of course, and immediately clicked with Jean Delorme, who was a Dominican priest. We had a remarkable relationship and his generosity touched and moved me profoundly. Here was an expert, well known, who had written extensively, recognized not only in the Catholic world, but beyond. He told me that I could join the group, if I wanted to, permanently, with no strings attached whatsoever. He gave me the full access to his own library. He introduced me to the lady who was basically managing the convent, telling her that whenever I wanted to come, I could have the key to the library.
This and other experiences are why I will never judge any person because of their religious affiliation. I have seen people with remarkable qualities from many traditions. I find it difficult to see anyone criticizing Catholics or others. I see it as unfair and inhumane. [1]

Ganoune Diop tells the Jesuits that it is “inhumane” and “unfair” to criticize Catholics and that he would never “judge anyone” for their religious affiliation. Ganoune Diop is being deceitful because he judges certain Seventh-day Adventists who speak of the end times. He passes judgment on certain Adventists by calling them “fringe,” “sectarians,” and “anti-Catholic” and who “misconstrue” and misinterpret “the signs of the times of the last day.”

Ganoune Diop will never judge Catholics, but he has no problem judging certain Seventh-day Adventists. This is the confession he made to the Jesuits in Rome. The truth is that it is NOT wrong to encourage people to accept the Three Angels’ Message. It is NOT wrong to obey God. It is God who identifies Babylon and He is calling them to come out. To use the so-called “human dignity” argument as an effort to quench the Three Angels’ Message would be really promoting Satan’s agenda:

“Satan has devised a state of things whereby the proclamation of the third angel’s message shall be bound about. We must beware of his plans and methods. There must be no toning down of the truth, no muffling of the message for this time. The third angel’s message must be strengthened and confirmed. The eighteenth chapter of Revelation reveals the importance of presenting the truth in no measured terms but with boldness and power…. There has been too much beating about the bush in the proclamation of the third angel’s message. The message has not been given as clearly and distinctly as it should have been” (Evangelism, p. 230).

Unfortunately, during this interview, Ganoune Diop has betrayed historic Seventh-day Adventism to the Jesuits:

“I saw the nominal church and nominal Adventists, like Judas, would betray us to the Catholics to obtain their influence to come against the truth. The saints then will be an obscure people, little known to the Catholics; but the churches and nominal Adventists who know of our faith and customs (for they hated us on account of the Sabbath, for they could not refute it) will betray the saints and report them to the Catholics" (Spalding & Magan Collection, p. 1).

Jesuits: What did you do after you finished with your master’s degree?

Ganoune Diop: The next large shift came when I was asked if I wanted to pursue an academic career as a teacher. That would entail going to the US, to Michigan, and doing a PhD in Old Testament. At the time, I was doing a PhD in New Testament in France at the Catholic University of Paris, linked to semiotics, the analysis of religious discourse. I was also studying at La Sorbonne. I found that fascinating. I stayed in the US for about five years, finishing a PhD in Old Testament. I then returned to France, this time as a teacher. I had studied ancient languages, Hebrew especially, while I was in college, then for my masters. While I was working in Paris, I decided that I really needed to have a degree in philology, the science of languages. I did not just want to be a good student in Hebrew or a good student in Greek. If I was to teach these languages, I wanted to have the necessary credentials. I went to the Catholic University of Paris again, while I was teaching in France, pursuing a master’s degree in philology at the School of Ancient Near Eastern Civilizations and Languages. [1]

Ganoune Diop in his own words describes his Roman Catholic education. This is undoubtedly a very serious situation when some of the highest leaders of both the Roman Catholic Church and the Seventh-day Adventist Church are products of the same theological institution. To be more frank, Ganaoune Diop is currently gaining more “wisdom” and “knowledge” to use in denominational employment for his work at the General Conference. He is being trained to help with church ministry, and the education is coming from the same school where prominent Roman Catholic theologians and leaders are being taught by Rome.

Jesuits: Backing up, did you go to a Quranic school in Senegal? Did you speak Arabic?

Ganoune Diop: I know Arabic and understood the Quran. I have the blessing of being comfortable with Hebrew, Aramaic Greek, and also Classical Quranic Arabic. I also studied Latin. [1]

Latin is the liturgical language of the Roman Catholic Church. Ganoune Diop is not only fluent in Latin, but in a video that came out, he also sings the Traditional Roman Catholic Song for Mass in Latin. [2] Diop sings the same melody that is used in the Vatican whenever Catholics praise their popes! This is an act of solidarity and unity with the ancient liturgy of the Roman Catholic Church. [2]

Jesuits: That’s a stunning story and I’m delighted to know it. A specific, side question: is the Seventh Day Adventist Church part of the World Council of Churches?

Ganoune Diop: The Seventh Day Adventist Church is not part of the World Council of Churches. We have what we call observer status. I’m invited to events and I work with them personally. I was even part of the writing committee at the Busan General Assembly few years ago. We collaborate and we partner, but the Seventh Day Adventist Church has chosen, for freedom of conscience purposes, not to belong to an ecumenical entity with a central organization, because belonging to such a central organization is like surrendering one’s constitutional conscience. This may be why the Catholic Church, for example, while having very close and cordial relationships, cannot be under the umbrella of another organization. We position ourselves in a similar way.

This is a leadership double-talk. Ganoune Diop says that even though Seventh-day Adventists “collaborate” and “partner” with the World Council of Churches and even if they serve on its policy “writing” committees; they are not members. We are only partners, but not members. We write policies for the World Council of Churches, but we are not really part of them. What is the difference? There is no difference in the eyes of God:

"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers. This does not refer to marriage alone; any intimate relation of confidence and copartnership with those who have no love for God or the truth, is a snare” (Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 13).

Jesuits: In your academic journeys, have you dealt with Vedic, Eastern religions or has it been mainly within the Abrahamic family?

Ganoune Diop: I have had extensive contacts, mainly on Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism, a little less, but significantly or sufficiently, to be able to have an intelligent conversation with even some shamanic or other Asian traditions. I have studied many schools of Hinduism and Buddhism.

This man needs to be thrown out. He need not to represent Seventh-day Adventists any longer! The Omega of Apostasy is on full display. Seventh-day Adventists have had “extensive” contacts with paganism, pantheism and shamanism. Do you know what “shamanic” traditions are? That is talking about people who interact with the dead or the spirit world. [3] We are embracing the Pope’s Fratellii Tutti agenda that refuses to convert or judge anyone, including the indigenous faiths. The plan is to learn from them, not change them.

Jesuits: With such a rich background of scholarship, are you teaching and writing or are you focusing more on dialogue and engagement at this point?

Ganoune Diop: I study religions deeply enough to try to articulate what they believe in ways that they will recognize and be comfortable with, that is not derogatory, judgmental, or trampling on their dignity. Absolutely not. What is Islam really about? I have taught that in several settings, and Muslims will stand up or come and thank me, saying that I help them better understand their own religion. When other people say that, and this is not just anecdotal, I am grateful. But I am very careful to manage that so that it is not politicized. I’m close to people who are Muslims, Jewish, or people of other faiths. Again, I have embraced the whole human family. What other way there is for me if even of God it is said that God loves the whole world?

Unbelievable! Ganoune Diop says that he has been helping Muslims to better embrace and understand their Muslim religion. His mission is fulfilled when he can help others become more rooted in their superstitions. This is not Adventism. This is Romanism. Why does Diop even work in the General Conference? He is repeating (like a parrot) the same universal brotherhood taught by the Freemasons at the Vatican. [4]

Ganoune Diop is articulating Rome’s agenda in ways that knows no equal. In his interview with the Jesuits, he boasts of having been educated by Rome. He boasts of his friendship with Dominican Priests. He boasts of his “extensive” relationships with Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Shamanism (communication with the dead). He boasts of helping people become better rooted in their own non-Christian religions. And he talks about being a “person of reconciliation” between Roman Catholics, Evangelicals and other religions.

Jesus warned us against false prophets in the last days. These would be men who will make false claims in the name of God, which God has not sanctioned (Matthew 24:11). In the book of Revelation, the Antichrist will have his false prophets who will point people to the Universal Brotherhood of the New World Order. Seventh-day Adventist leaders at General Conference level and every other level cannot play the role of the false prophets in the kingdom of the Antichrist.

Seventh-day Adventists cannot approve of this new reorientation of the end-time events. We cannot embrace this new path for God’s people. This is Rome’s new vocation for the Remnant people that God will never authorize. We are not global secular humanists. We are not world imitators. We are the light of the world that will soon enlighten this dark earth with the glory of God (Revelation 18:1-5). Instead of allowing the world’s agenda to change us, we are to help transform the lives of people with the word of God.

WWII not a world at war, but a war on the world

German soldier executing Ukranian mother and child, Ivangorod, Ukraine, 1942

The Nazi invasion of the world was not just another war. And the chaos of genocide that encircled the globe was not a world hating itself. It was a war of Satan and his human hosts making war upon the rest of humanity that wasn’t so fully possessed by him. WWII was the Vatican’s major push to set the stage for its eventual take-over for a new world order, which we now are witnessing in its final movements today. 

But, there is yet to be a last war against the world. WWII was the work of the sixth head (kingdom) to establish the seventh head (kingdom) of a seven-headed beast power explained in Revelation 17. But soon to appear will be the eighth head (kingdom), which must necessarily require another world war. That final war of wars will destabilize the last remnants of Noah’s old world order to establish the brave new world of the eighth kingdom, the kingdom of perdition.

“The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition…. And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.” (Rev. 17:8,10).

Five kingdoms were fallen.... The time reference for this vision speaks to the point when the beast was left in the wilderness as seen in Revelation 12:15, 16, i.e. after Providence opened up America, delivering the persecuted church of the wilderness from the beast’s flood of water, i.e. its Jesuit Counter-Reformation all out offensive to utterly eradicate the Protestant Reformation. Thus, Satan designed the five kingdoms to progressively bring back Nimrod’s ancient satanic apostasy to full restoration. Those five empires were the Neo-Babylonian, the Medo-Persian, the pagan Greek and Roman, and the Holy Roman. 

The sixth (head) kingdom would be a 150 year (the Revelation 9:5 fifth trumpet’s five prophetic months) empire of Republican-Protestant America falling progressively before the encroaching Jesuit covert army that began shortly after 1844. The five prophetic month, 150 literal year period began in 1849 at the shift of Pope Pius IX’s congenial administration from moderate to Jesuit driven ultra-Montanism. That covert Jesuit war, ending in 1999, gave rise to the short-term next seventh kingdom’s rabid movements for a Jesuit Vatican and its United Nations, in an increasingly overt war to re-establish, not an old, alcoholic Dark Ages papacy, but a clean, New Age occult, Spiritual Formation, world-dominating Jesuit papacy. More accurately, the seventh kingdom has been the reconstructing of the most venerable Nimrod apostasy that he foisted upon humanity. This attack came shortly after Noah had established the old world order of government founded upon allegiance to the Law of God and to the laws protecting His human family. Noah’s world order, founded upon family and faith in the Creator, has kept this world in relative peace. But the old righteous kingdom of familial love that Noah built up is falling before the new regime of despotic, absolute state control over every  member of Adam’s children, body, mind, and soul.

All that we now await are the horrors of the eighth kingdom, the new world order of perdition.

“And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.” (Rev. 17:11).

The beast with seven extra heads, plus its own most ancient head, has been ascending from the bottomless pit since 1849, surfing upon the waves of worldliness, which Protestant America sought with all its heart by the California gold rush, the oil bonanzas, the alcohol and drug trades, the power-mongering and money-getting. God has been giving apostate Protestantism what it has sought from the god of this world. Protestants preferred an easy, comfortable life rather than Jesus’ purification in preparation for His return. More and more Protestant America has spoken for the god of this world, even now speaking like the god of this world.

So there must be another world war. WWIII will be the final Jesuit jockeying for world domination, their installation of leaders in top-most positions of every national government and big business around the globe. The world’s dictators have been Jesuit led; and likewise the world’s billionaires. But the rising WWIII will be Nazism on an order never before seen or conceived of. The coming global conflict will once more be another war against humanity. It will subjugate the world populace for the “man of sin”, the “antichrist”, the “son of perdition”, who comes “after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, with all deceivableness of unrighteousness” in the perpetrators-masters of deception who will eternally perish. Despite all of their dark master’s glowing promises, the company of master deceivers will not escape the glory of Christ’s return, but will be instantaneously destroyed by His brightness. “Her hired men are in the midst of her like fatted bullocks; for they also are turned back, and are fled away together: they did not stand, because the day of their calamity was come upon them, and the time of their visitation.” (Jer. 46:21). 

But, prior to Christ’s glorious day, the final masterpiece of deception will be the personal appearance of Satan himself, imitating the return of Jesus from heaven. Satan then dwelling among mankind, atrocities and carnage will once more abound, like the above photo. Satan, more vehemently than Nimrod, the ogre of old, will provoke the worst evils in the global human nature to be expressed against their dominating Nimrod Jesuit hosts. The Jesuit papacy will then be 1000 times more unconscionable and ruthless than in former ages. It is the time of judgment upon godless America and its godless world.

Covid-19 and Covid-delta are signs of the approaching finale of the ancient beast that has already ascended from hell and is making its last preparations to go into perdition to drag the whole of humanity down after him. What will the scarlet beast’s perdition look like? It will be a Hitler SS empire on steroids. All the violence, atrocities, pagan resurgence with papal backing, all that made our past hundred years a miserable and a God-forsaken period, will be seen in magnified vigor and ruin of the human soul.

We, the Protestants, turned away from the only true God. We desired our carnal natures over His divine nature. We broke the covenant that our Reformation forefathers made with Him. We no longer deserve the government of peace that Protestantism provided to America, and through America to the rest of the world. Therefore, it all must go away—all of our rights of property and person, all of our civil and religious liberty. Our hearts and even our bodies will belong to the Vatican enemy from the Dark Ages. Look around. The beast is back and with a vengeance to regain everything that Protestantism took from it in 1517 and 1776.

The eighth head, the Trinitarian, necromancing, original Nimrod empire for Satan, ascended from the bottomless pit shortly after the apostle John passed. It received Imperial support at the Nicene Council in AD 325, and reigned supreme for 1,260 years beginning in AD 538 after the routing of the Ostrogoths. The Vatican’s deadly wound, which the Reformation sword of the Spirit gave it, is healed.

The final beast will no longer resemble Greco-Roman philosophy but, raw, rank spiritualism, and carnal worship to the most ancient familiar spirit, Ashtoreth, Mother Earth, Mother Guia. This Magna Mater, Queen of heaven will be supported by a rabid, malignant, gestapo Nazi empire that simulates the violence of its master, Baal. All the world leaders will be joined to this government-society with the universal Church overseeing it all, feeding the government-society the false hopes and lying doctrines that they desire, “with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made dunk with the wine of her fornication.” (Rev. 17:2).

In mass confusion and mayhem Satan will rule over the minds of mankind, keeping them from finding any faith in God. “Surely in the floods of great waters they shall no come nigh unto Him.” (Psa. 32:6). When the Son of man comes in power and glory, He will not find faith in the earth.  All around dense darkness will cover the earth, and gross darkness the minds of the people. Only a very small, holy elite that early on prepared for this very, end-time perdition will be fortified by the redeeming love and faith of the only-begotten Son of God.

J.A. Wylie, the servant of God

 " Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints." (Psa. 116:15).

Throughout the great controversy played out on the earth, God has never been without a continuous witness of His truth. Below is just such a representative for the Lord Jesus, the great Spirit of truth, as all revelation of truth has come through the testimony of Jesus. 

Even if all Catholic tradition wasn't rooted of Dr. Wylie's theology, even if his writing doesn't bear the Third Angel's present truth of the "solemn testimony upon which the destiny of the church hangs", J.A. Wylie's works have given an abundance of documentation that was needed for substantiating the inspired insights of Ellen White. 

Couldn't the same arrangement be said to have happened in the writing of the Bible? The prophets were authorities on the truth to be presented, and the events portrayed to them. But they had to rely on the non-inspired historians for documenting places and dates connected with the prophecy. Therefore, James Wylie and Ellen White were providentially placed, indispensable contemporaries.

His loyalty to the Reformation, inherited from his father's early instructions and example, and then his college teachers, Dr. Thomas Chalmers and Dr. Thomas M'Crie, led to Dr. Wylie's promotion of biblical justification by faith, and the great effects of Protestantism and Catholicism on human history, have added only depth to understanding the holy and happy tree of life and the miserable tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

                           ------

(Died May 1, 1890.)

by Rev. C. A. Salmond, M.A., Edinburgh.

The Free Church Monthly, August 1, 1890.

In the lamented removal of Dr. Wylie, the leading representative of a Church and also of a cause has been taken from us. Surviving as he did the younger M'Crie, he was the most notable living representative, for years past, of the majority of the Original Secession body, who joined the Free Church in 1852. And, as everybody knows, he has long been the leading Protestant authority, not in Scotland only, but in English-speaking Christendom, on all questions relating to the Romish controversy.

Born at Kirriemuir on 9th August 1808, he had nearly completed his eighty-second year when he died, on 1st May of the present year; but such was his vitality even as an octogenarian, that at the time of his death he had in contemplation an amount of literary work, the thought of which would have burdened many a younger man. He hoped, for one thing, to finish his "History of the Scottish Nation," by adding other three volumes to the third lately issued; and he had expressed his willingness, when Mr. Cusin died, to undertake if called upon-- a task happily committed since to his friend Mr. M'Crie of Ayr-- the preparation of the next series of the Cunningham Lectures.

His name-- James Aitken Wylie-- is itself suggestive, to those familiar with Scottish Secession history of the surroundings and influences among which as a boy he was reared. James Aitken, his minister and name-father, was one of the most godly and in every way estimable leaders of the "Old Light Anti-burghers," and Dr. Wylie felt and owned to the last how much he owed to his nurture in that school of robust primitive piety. It may interest modern readers about "Thrums" to find the old man writing thus, not long ago:--

"My heart often goes back to Kirriemuir. Its Communion Sabbaths, though now eighty years behind me, are still green and fragrant in my memory. I bless God that I was born in the Original Secession Church. I now see that it was an essential preparation for doing the work to which I have been called; and if I have done any good in the world, the ordering of my birth has been one of the main subordinate causes. The 'History of Protestantism' has its roots in the feelings, the kindlings, and the aspirations of my boyhood, and in the sympathy for the oppressed and downtrodden which was wrought in me by the derision and persecution which Mr. Anderson [author of 'The Ladies of the Covenant'] and myself daily endured from a set of reprobate school-fellows, who termed us 'Aitkenites.'"

His education was begun in the parish school of his native place. Then he passed to Marischal College, Aberdeen, for three years, completing his Arts course by a session at St. Andrews, under Dr. Thomas Chalmers. In 1827 he entered the O. S. Divinity Hall in Edinburgh, and there came under the influence of a man who impressed him even more than Chalmers had done-- Dr. Thomas M'Crie, the biographer of Knox. He was admitted to intimate fellowship by M'Crie, and he carried the memory of his friend and teacher with him as a life-long inspiration. In 1828, James Aitken Wylie was one of eleven divinity students who, with twenty-one ministers and seven probationers of the Original Secession Synod, "renewed the Covenants" in Edinburgh; and in him the last survivor of this little band of jurants has passed away. Referring to the abiding influence on Dr. Wylie's mind and character of this early environment, Principal Rainy has fitly said: "His religious life was nourished in some of the richest lines of the Scottish pious tradition; and from that circle and centre of influence he had derived impressions which gave a special character-- and an attractive one-- to his modes of view and feeling. He always retained a full sympathy with the characteristic tendencies of the Old Secession in matters religious and ecclesiastical; yet with a certain largeness of construction, and with a literary instinct, which enabled him in various respects to keep pace with his time, and to perceive the new form in which old forces must work."

His license took place on 1st December 1829, and he was ordained at Dollar on 20th April 1831. His pastoral sphere there was a very limted one, but its duties were faithfully and cheerfully discharged for the next fifteen years, during which period, however, his pen had found for him a much wider constituency. To the time of the Dollar ministry belong his "Modern Judea," "Scenes from the Bible," and other works, which were most favourably received, and ran into numerous additions.

In 1846, Mr. Wylie had an important offer from Hugh Miller, which, by the advice of the younger M'Crie and with the eager approval of Dr. Candlish, he felt it his duty to accept-- the joint-editorship, namely, of The Witness. This involved his transference to Edinburgh, on whose streets, for the succeeding forty-four years of incessant literary activity, he has been one of the most familiar figures. His association with Hugh Miller on The Witness was a very happy one; and some eight hundred of the leading articles in that almost epoch-making journal were from Mr. Wylie's hand.

His exuberant energy found outlet the while in the publication of several separate volumes, the most notable of which appeared in 1851, and was entitled "The Papacy: its History, Dogmas, Genius, and Prospects." This treatise gained for him, by the unanimous award of Drs. Wardlaw, Cunningham, and Eadie, the Evangelical Alliance prize of a hundred guineas. It also won for him a European reputation,-- to which the savage attacks of Romish critics, at home and on the Continent, brought added lustre,-- and it helped to give direction to his future life.

In 1852, as already mentioned, Mr. Wylie joined the Free Church of Scotland; and in the following year he became editor of the Free Church Record-- a post which he held for the next eight years. The degree of LL.D. was conferred upon him by Aberdeen University in 1856. Of his separate literary ventures at this time, one was a competitive essay on "The Gospel Ministry: the Duty and Privilege of Supporting It." He secured by it the prize of £150; and in this connection Dr. Joseph Parker, who obtained proximos honores, writes: "On procuring Dr. Wylie's essay and reading it, I said, 'This should have won both the prizes: it is infinitely the best.'" The "Pilgrimage from the Alps to the Tiber," "The Waldenses," and "The Great Exodus," also found many readers.

In 1860, mainly through the instrumentality of Dr. Begg, the Protestant Institute was established; and Dr. Wylie, by acclamation, was invited to be the lecturer. The appointment in his case was for life; and though the subject of Popery is not in itself attractive, it is true-- and it is much to say-- that for thirty successive years Dr. Wylie's treatment of it has continued to be a living influence in our land. In him the Churches had no mere holder of an office, but a man with a mission, who, while centering his energies on the functions of his chair, was ready to devote his life in every possible way to the exposure of Papal errors and the clear and fervid counter exposition of the principles of the Reformation. If the members of even his first class felt that they were sitting at the feet of one who was a past-master in his subject, the successive relays of students who, to the number of about two thousand, went through his classes, had equal reason to know that in their teacher they had one not only familiar with 

Popish theory, but keenly awake to Popish practice in all its contemporary developments.

Besides holding his classes, Dr. Wylie addressed countless meetings in his time throughout the country. His "delivery," it must be said, contrasted unfavourably with the grace of his written style; but he rose on occasions to a genuine eloquence which fairly carried his audience along with him. This was notably the case once and again in Exeter Hall, where his appearance was latterly hailed with the utmost enthusiasm; and in many parts of England the announcement of Dr. Wylie's name would draw a large audience together at any time. This was partly to be accounted for by the greater urgency of the Romish question in England. It was partly, no doubt, also due to the great circulation of his writings in the sister country, where his magnum opus, for example-- "The History of Protestantism," 3 vols., 2,000 pp., 1874-77-- has sold in scores of thousands.

Dr. Wylie was not one to whom any large share of outward honours fell; nor did he covet them. But that he held a high place in the esteem and a warm place in the affections of many, came unmistakably out at the time of his jubilee in 1881. The meeting, presided over by Sir Henry Moncreiff, at which his portrait, now hanging in the Institute, was presented, was of the most genuinely appreciative character; and the £300 gift, handed to him by Dr. Whyte and the writer about the same time one day in his study, came in so freely from the few friends applied to throughout the country as to indicate that a much larger sum might readily have been gathered had a wider movement been set afoot. The intention of the gift, however, was completely realized; for in the following spring, at the age of seventy-four, the doctor accomplished his tour in Egypt and Palestine, of which he has given a graphic account in his "Land of the Pharaohs," and his "Over the Holy Land."

James A. WylieWe cannot enter further here into the details of his busy life. It was a life of great simplicity both in purpose and in habit. Spent mostly at the desk, or rather at the desk and mantlepiece on which a great part of his writing was done, it was varied by two regular daily "constitutionals," at daybreak and in the afternoon, when he was at home, and by an occasional excursion to one or other of the historic lands of Europe, in the intervals of his class work. The day was ordinarily crowned by an hour or two of cheerful converse by the hearth. Those favoured with his intimate friendship will bear the writer out in saying, as he has already done elsewhere, that to be with Dr. Wylie at such times, and to listen to his rich and sparkling conversation, on whatever subject might come up, meant both education and enjoyment.

Men spoke of him sometimes as a "fanatic;" but if his utterances on the Papacy were strong, his detestation of the system was equalled by his tenderness for its unhappy votaries. To virile strength he united a woman's sensibility. It was a profound mistake to fancy in him an acrid, self-assertive, one-idead controversialist. He was one of the best informed, most genial, and sympathic of men, and his deep unaffected humility was one of his greatest charms. You could not be long with him without perceiving in him a lover of Christ and of all good men, and his mellow unostentatious piety gave an unmistakable savour to all his life.

[Transcriber's note: The right hand border on the last column of the article was somewhat blurred by the fact that the binding of the book could not be laid flat against the copier. The following words in brackets [ ] are not exact quotes, but are near approximations, as far as I can tell.]

And now he has gone to be with Christ, for whom he lived and in whom he died. His end was as simple as his life had been. Influenza seized him at the close of his last session, when, through [extensive] work of various kinds, his system was [unusually weak]. For three or four weeks he was confined to bed. Though nothing serious was apprehended, [he was] greatly cheered, as were his two attached [disciples] by the occasional visits of his minister and [fellow] townsmen Dr. Whyte, in whose congregation he had long been an elder, and whose weekly pulpit ministrations had been to him a fountain of [life]. He said to me on the Sabbath evening before he died, "I have often been a very unworthy [worship]per, but I can truly say, 'Lord, I have loved the habitation of thy house, the place where thine honour dwelleth.'" It was not till the day before [the end] came that it was a settled conviction with him [that] he was to die. But by that time he had relinquished all his literary plans, asking anything or [nothing to] be done with his papers, as might seem to be best. His mind was reverting to early Kirrie days, and anon going forward to the eternal world, on [which] he was so soon to enter. I said, "You are [relying] on Christ, doctor?" "Yes," he replied; "[He is] Christ the Rock. If there's a piece of adamant [any]where in the universe, it's there-- Christ the Rock." Next morning I was again by his bedside. [Death] was now plainly written on his face. He spoke with difficulty some words of blessing, and as he [entered in] his breathless closing struggle with the last enemy, I could hear him say in the words of the old [psalm:]

"Upon the Lord, who worthy is

Of praises, will I cry:

And then shall I preserved be

Safe from mine enemy."

He remained conscious for a short [time after this], and could give a look of recognition [still], and a farewell pressure of the hand to those [close] to him. But he never spoke again; and [it will] ever be suggestive of a hallowed memory [and laud]able, after a lifelong friendship with him, to [quote] him in turn what he wrote to me of [the dear] M'Crie: "I watched by his bedside when [he was] dying, and I was the last to whom he [addressed] mortal speech."

Dr. Wylie's earthly remains were laid in the [New]ington cemetery, just a few yards from the [grave of] Dr. Begg. Principal Rainy made [impressive] reference to him in Free St. George's on the [follow]ing Sabbath, in the absence of Dr. Whyte[.] [In] speaking cordially of Dr. Wylie's work, his [literary] power, various knowledge, and "the [inexhaustible] fertillity of mind which age seemed [unable to] weaken or exhaust," Dr. Rainy said, [and with] these words we close: "Besides his [service we re]cognized in him the antique atmosphere and [light] and shade of an older time. We feel the [passing] away of memories and associations we [would gladly] have retained among us-- interesting, [edifying,] endeared. We are the poorer for the loss. [We see] the old order changing. We shall do well [to cleave] to the truth it lived by, and to reproduce [it with] the fidelity to truth and goodness, to Christ [and the] gospel, which inspired it."

Concerning the California wildfires: Interview with John and Matt by Shellie

"Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish." (2Thess. 2:9,10).

Today, Protestant America is coming under increasing military assault in a very unconventional war. From within more than from without, every fiber of our societal fabric is under attack: personal morals, social mores, religion, economy, science, history, medical, government, military, etc. Deception and delusion, the power of suggestion and slight of hand, are the name of the game. Psy-op after psy-op. All systems that created walls of protection for Americans, are failing and being used against Americans, and against what made them great--the Protestant faith in Jehovah the God of Protestantism, and the 1611 Protestant Bible. 

Everywhere I go I see and hear forgetfulness of Jehovah--the most pervasive unbelief! It's like what He said of Israel in Jeremiah's day, "Can a maid forget her ornaments, or a bride her attire? yet My people have forgotten Me days without number." (Jer. 2:32).

Protestant Americans say just like the ancient people of God, "Our nation is at the top of the world. We're mature adults and sophisticated now. God, we don't need Your help anymore. Thanks, but C U later aligator!"

"O generation, see ye the word of the Lord. Have I been a wilderness unto Israel? a land of darkness? wherefore say My people, We are lords; we will come no more unto Thee? " (Jer. 2:31,32).

"Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto Me?" (Jer. 2:21).

Revelation 12:15-17 shows that North America was a gift from Providence to the churches of Protestantism, for a refuge from papal persecution and despotism. By divine signs and wonders the infant Protestant movement as verily was rescued from the Dark Ages captivity as were the Mosaic children of Israel delivered from centuries of Egyptian bondage. Holy Roman Emperor Carlos responded immediately to the Pope's call to destroy the "Lutheran heritics". But just as the Emperor set out to fulfill that mission, the Turks attacked southeast Europe. After twenty years and all his wealth gone, he was unable to destroy the Protestant movement. It had grown exponentially and was spreading uncontrollably. Providential, the Muslim invasion? The Lord said, "I will fight for My Protestants."

Then they hazarded the gigantic ocean to get away from the corrupt Catholic world. The Pilgrims were "wholly a right seed", and "a noble vine." And for generations the influence of the Lord's Spirit through faith in the Bible left most of the Protestant colonialists tied to the God of their Reformation fathers.

But, today Protestant and Adventist Americans both have ended no differently than the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel (respectively), which kingdoms both were vomited out of their land. The exact same vomiting out of the holy land is about to occur again in America. Why do I say that America is the holy land as was the ancient theocracy of Israel? Because, like ancient Israel, our laws and land have been blessed by heaven, abounding in every holy pleasure, flowing with milk and honey, freedom and joy. 

For the past 401 years, Protestant America has been Jehovah's "mighty and holy people" (Dan. 8:24). And Protestant Americans still are, even though popular cries point to 1948 as the Jews' reclamation and reinstatement to divine favor. But, the real indication of the mighty and holy people is that they hold the truth of God's word, and have His super-abundant temporal blessing. 

But, Protestantism is the only religion that preaches the present truth that the only-begotten Son of God came at the end of the time appointed, prophesied in Daniel's great Messianic prophecy that was fulfilled 2,000 years ago. Messiah Jesus poured out His soul in our place to spare us Judgment Day damnation, and appeal to us to return to His Father and spend the rest of our lives obedient to His Father's commandments.

But now we're going back to the Dark Ages' persecuting Beast power, the Vatican. We're worshipping its Trinity god that is over God the Father. We don't want the Father's commandments. We prefer the papacy's freedom from divine Law. We like the Papal-Evangelical constant mesmerizing mantra, "Grace! Grace! Nothing but super-sweet grace! The acceptance of that falsehood, that God doesn't condemn sin, has been a slippery slope, and increasingly so over the past century. 

"Shall I not visit for these things? saith the Lord: shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?" (Jer. 5:29).

Now the churches are preaching, "Peace and safety!", they knowing what the scriptures say in regard to that:

"For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape." (1 thess. 5:2,3).

FERLive.com Down the Rabbit Hole with Shellie Lewis Part 1 Paradise Fires--Massive "Event" Expert Testimony Retired Fire Captains

 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma26EBzJkxE&t=366s

Part 2 here: 

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/290763719689422710/

Why the nations get angry at the end

 "And the nations were angry, and Thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that Thou shouldest give reward unto Thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear Thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth." (Rev. 11:18).

Another prophecy, that of Daniel 7 sheds light on this one, "The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces." (Dan. 7:23).

This fourth kingdom was Rome, the fourth great empire that ruled the ancient world. But different from the previous three empires, it would reign until the end of time. Under many guises, through many schemes, professing both of the basic life philosophies, spiritual power and temporal power, it's tyranny over humanity would be complete. 

Through its self-assumed role as spiritual leader, this unique political power would, as God's special representative, dominate every facet of human existence. Never-theless, Daniel chapters 7, 8, 11, and Revelation chapters 8-18 showcase this power actually as God's primary nemesis, and His enemy #1. Rather than being God's channel for blessing humanity, it would be Satan's medium for destroying the Earth. 

"They that see thee [Lucifer] shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; that made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?" (Isa. 14:16,17).

But, Satan has an accomplice for destroying the world--that accomplice is us. God would never allow the devils to destroy His people unless they chose to put their most implicit trust in Satan instead of in their holy Redeemer. But, perpetual idolatry and worshiping Satan have made the human race complicit in its own destruction. "The inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication." (Rev. 17:2).

And if the world wants to be drunken, then it cannot serve Jehovah in holiness and sobriety. "But," Peter's injunction to the church since its beginning has been, "the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer." (1Pet. 4:7).

If their prayers to the Holy One come from the deranged, self-indulged spirit of them who knew better, then He will not listen.

"And the Lord spake unto Aaron, saying, Do not drink wine nor strong drink, thou, nor thy sons with thee, when ye go into the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die: it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations: and that ye may put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean." (Lev. 10:8-10).

This pronouncent resulted from Aaron's two eldest sons dying from the Lord's wrath because they experimented with worship in conjunction with a mind-altering drug, in this case, alcohol. They knew better than to approach God with irreverent derangement and foolish play.

The condemnation of the world at the end is that the "peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues" (Rev. 17:15) of lost humanity are drunken with Magna Mater, the Queen of heaven. In ancient Rome Magna Mater was Diana, the multitudinous breasted goddess "whom all Asia and the world worshippeth". (Acts 19:27). Today Mary gets the title, Queen of heaven. As with the nations around the world ever since Nimrod instituted paganism, Mary (Magna Mater), the goddess of Catholicism, and God the Holy Spirit, the Magna Mater goddess of Protestantism, both goddesses being one and the same only gracious and adored Magna Mater mother of God, offer a doctrinal intoxication that goes deeper, and is longer lasting, than any chemical intoxication. 

Beliefs create their own chemical in the brain. Truth re-engineers the mind with chemicals that create the fruits of the Spirit, hope, love, joy, peace, patience, meekness, etc. Pagan doctrines produce lawless chemicals, animosity, arrogance, distrust, unrest, etc. False hope, which is based on promises of God's grace while denying the fulfillment of the condition of heeding His condemnation of sin, receives no comforting reconciled Spirit from God. The grace of God comes only through the narrow gate of condemnation of sins.

"For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth.

 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the Father chasteneth not?

But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons." (Heb. 12:6-8).

Yet, the whole religious world follows the universally held lawless and pernicious tradition of demon invention.

It was for worshiping the Trinity god and it's pleasing doctrines of grace without truth, that Jehovah pronounced the following curses that would end in His wrath. 

"The Lord shall thee with madness, and blindness, and astonishment of heart:

And thou shalt grope at noonday, as the blind gropeth in darkness, and thou shalt not prosper in thy ways: and thou shalt be only oppressed and spoiled evermore, and no man shall save thee.

Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her: thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein: thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes thereof.

Thine ox shall be slain before thine eyes, and thou shalt not eat thereof: thine ass shall be violently taken away from before thy face, and shall not be restored to thee: thy sheep shall be given unto thine enemies, and thou shalt have none to rescue them.

Thy sons and thy daughters shall be given unto another people, and and thine eyes shall look, and fail with longing for them all the day long; and there shall be no might in thine hand.

The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up; and thou shalt be only oppressed and crushed alway:

So that thou shalt be mad for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see...." (Deut. 28:28-34).

"The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low.

He shall lend to thee, and thou shalt not lend to him: he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail." (Vs. 43,44).

"Moreover all these curses shall come upon thee, and shall pursue thee, and overtake thee, till thou be destroyed; because thou hearkenedst not unto the voice of the Lord thy God, to keep His commandments and His statutes which He commanded thee:

And they shall be upon thee for a sign and for a wonder, and upon thy seed for ever.

Because thou servedst not the Lord thy God with joyfulness, and with gladness of heart, for the abundance of all things;

Therefore shalt thou serve thine enemies which the Lord shall send against thee, in hunger, and in thirst, and in nakedness, and in want of all things: and He shall put a yoke of iron upon thy neck, until He have destroyed thee." (Vs. 45-48).

The third angel's message of the Old Testament shows God's wrath upon ancient Israel for getting drawn into the intoxication of serving lawless, celebrating worship to devils.

"Lest there should be among you man, or woman, or family, or tribe, whose heart turneth away this day from the Lord our God, to go and serve the gods of these nations; lest there should be among you a root that beareth gall and wormwood;

And it come to pass, when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart, to add drunkenness to thirst:

The Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord and His jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven...." (Deut. 29:18-20). 

Such a reckless person or people would reap more than an earful of divine anger, they would reap endless Sodom-like destruction by Jehovah departing from them, and demons taking up residence in their souls, as we still learn of today at the Dead Sea, almost four thousand years after wicked Sodom's destruction.

And all the passersby exclaim concerning that individual or family or tribe, "The whole land thereof is brimstone, and salt, and burning, that it is not sown, nor beareth, nor any grass groweth therein, like the overthrow of Sodom, and Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboim, which the Lord overthrew in his anger, and in His wrath." (Vs. 23).

"When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none.

Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished.

Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be unto this perverse generation." (Matt. 12:43-44).

In the end, souls will be dominated by a spiritual legion that won't let go or let up its hold on them. The honeymoon of sweet nothings is over. The intoxicating lawless grace ends in a most horrific nightmarish hangover, the world over. Tiny in comparison to today's billions was divine wrath upon the post-flood generation that began paganism at Babel. Gigantic will be the wrath upon the coming worldwide drunken deep dive into the most extreme, yearned for lawlessness.

Now, on a much grander scale, a similar discomfiting and confusion of faces will create a delerium and wretchedness, that no one beforehand can comprehend or fathom. Enabling, lawless Ashtoreth will turn into a tyrannical Baal. The voice of gracious, lawless Mary paves the way for a furious, abusive Ba-Allah Jesus.

Because Jehovah has been written off and kicked out of the soul, wrath from the demons, will then dominate humanity's thoughts without reprieve. And they will have no rest. Jehovah claims responsibility for the demonic takeover only because He controls the liberties conferred to the devils and He retains ultimately responsibility for anything that happens in the universe.

"And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,

The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of His indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." (Rev. 14:9-11).

In total disavowal of God's claims on His children, they will be at war with Him in their conscience. His words, His presence will receive the same disconserted exasperation that demoniacs had whenever Jesus came near.

The New Testament third angel's message, like its Old Testament version, shows the same "fire and brimstone", smoke and burning. But it's jealousy; it's the righteous outrage of a huge Father of love whose children were abducted and re-educated to distrust and hate Him. How can He let those propagandized agents of His arch enemy enter eternal life? Those workers of iniquity would forever harrass, terrorize, and assassinate the children who love Him.

Thus, the first world nations, at the end will see all the good life disappear, and the easy times from enslaving the third world masses, ease and convenience which they hoped would continue for many millennia, will turn into oppression. All the curses of Deuteronomy 28, which will flow from the goodness of the God of unchanging love, will not lead them to repent. He will give them only the oppression that He allowed them to give His children for their purification. "He who smote the people in wrath with a continual stroke, he that ruled the nations in anger" (Isa. 14:6), will turn on his taskmasters.

But, as the last plagues fall, this generation will become increasingly determinedly resistant to God.

"And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.... And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they gnawed their tongues for pain, and blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds." (Rev. 16:1,2,10,11).

"And the nations were angry, and Thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that Thou shouldest give reward unto Thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear Thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.

And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in His temple the ark of His testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail." (Rev. 11:18,19).